Legal Opinion

Haygood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1997No. A96A2546PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

1. Haygood was convicted of criminal trespass and contends the evidence was insufficient to show she acted with criminal intent. The charge stemmed from an incident in which Haygood trimmed a hedge located on the property of her neighbor King. As relevant here, “A person commits the offense of criminal trespass when he intentionally damages any property of another without his consent and the damage thereto is $500.00 or less or knowingly and maliciously interferes with the possession or use of the property of another per son without his consent.” OCGA § 16-7-21 (a).

Sufficiency…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Fleming v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Haygood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Inglett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Gidey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. McCrosky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API