Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Goldfarb

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 18, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The administrator c. t. a. of Marcus Goldfarb instituted a proceeding under section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, to discover property of his testator allegedly withheld by the executor under the will of Anna Goldfarb, deceased wife of Marcus. The petition alleges that Marcus Goldfarb suffered a stroke on May 1, 1950, as a result of which he became totally incompetent to manage his affairs. When he became incapacitated, he had assets described in the petition, which aggregated in value more than $1,000,000. He remained, it is alleged, totally without mental capacity,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westminster Presbyterian Church of West Twentythird Street v. Trustees of PresbyteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Cornell v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. In re the Estate of HeckscherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeinbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  2. In re KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re the Estate of FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. In re the Estate of GoldfarbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API