In re the Estate of Goldfarb
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
The respondents in a proceeding under section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act move to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that there are already two pending proceedings wherein the questions presented for decision are identical with those here presented. The petitioner opposes the motion. The fundamental question which is sought to be raised in all of these proceedings is whether certain stocks, bonds and bank accounts belong to the estate of Marcus Goldfarb (of which the petitioner is the administrator c. t. a.) or to the estate of Anna D. Goldfarb, who was the wife of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dresdner v. Goldman Sachs Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.