Legal Opinion

Wagniere v. Dunnell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 29, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the CourtParkhurst, J.

The plaintiff brought suit ■ in assumpsit, claiming damages for breach of an agreement which was as follows, viz.:

“February 9th, 1906.
“Mr. Gustave Wagniere
“ Dear Sir,
“ Understanding that you will give me your best ability as a finisher of cotton and silk or all silk goods especially, but of any other grade of goods within your knowledge and ability, I hereby agree to employ you at a compensation of Fifty (50) Dollars per week for three (3) years from the date hereof or for so much of such three (3) years as your results show the ability that you now claim to be able to give me.
“Yours truly,
“Wm…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WeeksNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Nelson v. Shelby Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Drake v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Harney v. BurhansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blue Valley Creamery Co. v. Consolidated Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Silverman v. BernotSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. Deevy v. PorterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Land v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API