Legal Opinion
24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 2007No. 03 Civ. 3204(MGC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of a record distribution contract entered into by plaintiff 24/7 Records, Inc. (“24/7”) and defendant Sheridan Square Entertainment, LLC d/b/a Artemis Records (“Artemis”). The complaint alleges that Artemis breached the contract, and that defendant Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (“Sony”) unlawfully induced Artemis to do so. As proof of its damages, 24/7 proffers two witnesses as experts. Defendants move in limine to exclude the testimony of these witnesses. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
In June of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. AEP Power Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Young Broadcasting Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- DHANASARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- Buckley v. Deloitte & Touche USA LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012