Legal Opinion

Richards v. Maine Central Railroad

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 10, 1957No. Civ. No. 5-54PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIGNOUX, District Judge.

The-ruling presently announced arises upon the plaintiff’s Motion to Produce, under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. and the supporting Affidavit of Daniel J. Murphy, Esquire, both filed with this Court on November 20, 1957; and the Affidavit of Walter F. Bird, dated December 6, 1957, filed by the defendant in opposition to said motion.

For a statement of the nature of the principal action reference is made to the Memorandum of Delehant, J. in these proceedings dated September 30, 1957. D.C., 21 F.R.D. 590.-

Hearing upon the aforesaid motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Richards v. Maine Central RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
  2. Setzers Super Stores of Georgia, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Marsh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Marsh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  5. Setzers Super Stores of Georgia, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API