Briggs v. Briggs
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Whether language which otherwise would describe a fee absolute is restricted to a life estate by subsequent expressions contained in the will presented for construction is the question we are to consider.
The plaintiff, Alfred I. Briggs, is a son of Claude Briggs and the grandson of the testator, Ireson F. Briggs. Resting his claims upon the provisions of his grandfather’s will, the plaintiff claims title tO' an undivided interest in 640 acres of Sanborn County land described in the sixth provision of that will.
The testator, Ireson F. Briggs, settled on a farm in San-born county in 1880. His…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lumpkin v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Beech v. ParksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Parker State Bank v. FieldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Hill-Taylor Co. v. ShadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- In re the Estate of MerriganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re the Estate of StevensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Osterkamp v. WeeksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Kellar v. KasperDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1956
- Rowett v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Wells v. WedehaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.