Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Manning

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a suit on a Massachusetts judgment. The defence is a discharge in insolvency granted in this State on proceedings begun after the judgment was rendered. The plaintiffs were New Jersey creditors of the defendant, (a resident of Massachusetts,) and it is not denied that the original debt would not have been discharged. Ilsley v. Merriam, 7 Cush. 242. Kelley v. Drury, 9 Allen, 27. But the distinction is taken, that, as the plaintiffs in this case have elected to merge their debt in a Massachusetts judgment, that judgment at all events must be subject to the state laws, and is disposed of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Poe v. DuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. Hempstead v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  5. Watson v. BourneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Brown v. HannaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. KulowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Phoenix National Bank of Providence v. BatchellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. Y-D Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API