Legal Opinion
Schouest v. Loewenthal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1952No. 19580PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McBRIDE, Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this suit against the two defendants solidarily, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries and for injuries sustained by his automobile, arising out of a collision which occurred on April 30, 1948, and recovered judgment for $460 against Harold Loewenthal, the driver of the automobile involved in the collision with plaintiff’s car, and Harold Loewenthal has attempted to appeal devolutively. Plaintiff’s suit as to the other defendant, Otto R. Loewenthal, was dismissed, and as plaintiff did not take an appeal from the judgment, Otto R. Loewenthal is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Mount Olive Baptist Church v. New Zion Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Dickerson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. B-130Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- La Rue v. AdamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Geisenheimer Realty Co. v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Niagara Fire Ins. v. SchouestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Jones v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Dezendorf v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- George v. WinstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.