Legal Opinion

Niagara Fire Ins. v. Schouest

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1952No. 19567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

This case and that of Schouest v. Loewenthal, La.App., 58 So.2d 425, in which an opinion and decree was handed down by us this day, were consolidated and tried together. Both suits arose out of the same automobile accident.

This appeal presents for consideration the suit brought by Niagara Fire Insurance Company, the subrogee of Otto R. Loewen-thal, seeking to recover of Anatole Schouest the sum of $280.93, representing the damage sustained by Otto R. Loewenthal’s automobile as a result of the accident. The Niagara Fire Insurance Company has appealed from the judgment below…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Schouest v. LoewenthalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. DelanoixLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. White v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Roth v. Lloyd S. Gaubert, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Duree v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Duree v. State ex rel. Department of InstitutionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API