Felsenthal v. McMillan
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentSteakley, Justice
The question here is whether the tort arising out of the offense known as criminal conversation will be recognized as actionable in Texas. I would not do so. I do not regard of particular significance whether or not we now have this right of action in Texas by adoption of the common law, as the majority says. If we have, I would abolish it.
We should recognize the offense of criminal conversation for what it is. The term “criminal conversation,” in its general and comprehensive sense, is synonymous with “adultery”; but in its more limited and technical signification it may be defined as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- G. H. & S. A. R. R. v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Kelsey-Seybold Clinic v. MacLayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Turner v. HeavrinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Rheudasil v. ClowerTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Lisle v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.