State v. Begley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
By amended information defendant was charged with felonious stealing, as defined and denounced by §§ 560.156 and 560.161, sec. 1, subsec. (2), RSMo 1969. 1 On June 3, 1974, defendant appeared in person and with counsel in open court. Arraignment was waived by counsel. The trial court asked defendant to identify himself, asked him if he were represented by counsel, and asked if defendant understood “that anything [counsel] says here is the same as though you were saying it”. Defendant answered all these questions affirmatively. Addressing defendant’s counsel, the court called upon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gibbons v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. George Edward WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- State v. EnglandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. O'NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Forsythe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.