Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Royal Exchange Assurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1960No. Civ. 24334PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in declaratory relief to secure an interpretation of an insurance policy designated “Family Combination Auto Policy,” and a declaration of his rights thereunder. The facts are not disputed. Two automobiles owned by plaintiff were covered by the policy issued to him by defendant; among other coverages, the contract of insurance included medical payments for “$2000 each person” upon which a $13 premium was paid on “Car #1” and a lesser premium ($8.25) on “Car #2.” On December 19, 1958, the policy then being in full force and effect, plaintiff’s minor child was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Central Surety & Insurance Corporation v. ElderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.