Legal Opinion
Haas Enterprises, Inc. v. Davis
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 2003No. 22,923PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} The issue we address here is: When did the statute of limitations in this accountant’s malpractice case begin to run? Haas Enterprises, Inc. sued Bruce Davis on an unsecured promissory note. Bruce, his father Dr. B.J. Davis, and Dr. Davis’s medical practice, Davis P.C., in turn filed a counterclaim and third-party complaint against Haas Enterprises for its failure to file certain tax returns on its behalf for a number of years. 1 Haas Enterprises then defended on the basis that the statute of limitations had run on the claim.
{2} The district court found for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Richard L. Kroll, of the Estate of Gertrude O'reilly, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Chisholm v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lohm EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Sharts v. NatelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KerbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Akins v. United Steelworkers of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Autovest v. AgostoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Salehpoor v. New Mex. Inst. of Mining & Tech.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.