Legal Opinion

General Telephone Co. v. Pritchett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1969No. 44093PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. “The basic premise of the new Civil Practice Act is that it does away with ‘issue pleading’ and substitutes ‘notice pleading.’ In the famous Reynolds case (Reynolds v. Reynolds, 217 Ga. 234, 246 (123 SE2d 115)), the Supreme Court of Georgia quoted with approval the Supreme Court of the United States: ‘. . . Under the prior federal practice, the pre-trial functions of notice-giving, issue-formulation and fact-revelation were performed primarily and inadequately by the pleadings. Inquiry into the issues and the facts before trial was narrowly confined and was often cumbersome…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Byrd v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nipper v. Crisp CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API