General Telephone Co. v. Pritchett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. “The basic premise of the new Civil Practice Act is that it does away with ‘issue pleading’ and substitutes ‘notice pleading.’ In the famous Reynolds case (Reynolds v. Reynolds, 217 Ga. 234, 246 (123 SE2d 115)), the Supreme Court of Georgia quoted with approval the Supreme Court of the United States: ‘. . . Under the prior federal practice, the pre-trial functions of notice-giving, issue-formulation and fact-revelation were performed primarily and inadequately by the pleadings. Inquiry into the issues and the facts before trial was narrowly confined and was often cumbersome…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Byrd v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nipper v. Crisp CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969