Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 28, 2008No. A-9676PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Paul A. Ackerman was charged with two crimes: felony driving under the influence and failure to stop at the direction of a police officer. He was released on electronic monitoring pending his trial. After Ackerman was convicted, he asked the superior court to give him credit against his sentence for the time he spent on electronic monitoring. The superior court ruled that Ackerman was not entitled to credit against his sentence, and Ackerman now appeals this ruling.

Under AS 12.55.025(c), a defendant is entitled to credit against their sentence “for time spent in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DunlopAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nygren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  3. Matthew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKinley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
  2. Fungchenpen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API