Legal Opinion

Vasilenko v. Grace Gamily Church

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 2016No. C074801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

Plaintiff Aleksandr Vasilenko was hit by a car and injured while crossing Marconi Avenue in Sacramento. At the time, he was crossing a busy five-lane road on his way from an overflow parking lot controlled and staffed by defendant Grace Family Church (GFC or the church) to a function at the church. Vasilenko and his wife Larisa (collectively Vasilenko) sued GFC and others for, among other causes of action, negligence and loss of consortium, alleging that GFC acted negligently in locating its overflow parking lot in a place that required invitees like him to cross a busy…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bilyeu v. State Farm General Ins. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Vasilenko v. Grace Family ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API