Legal Opinion

State v. Hinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 863SC1001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

By his exceptions and assignments of error brought forward on appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the bills of indictment in those cases in which he was charged with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions, and the denial of his requests for certain instructions to the jury. We have considered his contentions and find no error in his trial.

In cases 85CRS13969, 85CRS13970, 85CRS13971, 85CRS13972 and 85CRS13973, each of the bills of indictment included the following language:. . . the defendant named…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. FerdinandoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. HargraveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. BlymyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API