Legal Opinion

Trustees for Alaska v. Fink

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1994No. 92-36932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

Trustees for Alaska sued Anchorage, arguing that Part D of the 1977 Amendments to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7501-7508, did not allow the municipality to make conditional commitments to Traffic Control Measures in Alaska’s State Implementation Plan. We hold that Anchorage could and did condition its commitment to expanding mass transit bus service upon the availability of funding. And we affirm the district court’s finding that Trustees failed to meet their burden of showing that Anchorage violated the condition by not taking reasonable steps to locate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Friends of the Earth v. Hugh CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Union Electric Company v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. Coalition for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clean Air Council v. MalloryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Trustees For Alaska v. FinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. (SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (SS) Goodeill v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API