Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Paul

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 16, 2004No. 91,129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Ronald Paul appeals the district court’s modification of his child support obligation, claiming that imputation of estimated child care expenses when imputing income to the custodial parent is in violation of the Kansas Child Support Guidelines (Guidelines). We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Overview

Ronald (Father) and Lucy Paul (Mother) were divorced in 2000, and Father was ordered to pay monthly child support of $700. In January 2002, SRS filed on behalf of Mother a motion to modify child support, claiming a material change of circumstances. The motion indicated that Mother’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. In re the Marriage of ShannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. In re CoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. In re the Marriage of BranchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. Sparks ex rel. Williams v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Matter of Marriage of Moler and MolerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API