Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Paul

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 2005No. 91,129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

This is an appeal challenging the district court’s authority under the Kansas Child Support Guidelines (Guidelines) to impute estimated child care expenses when imputing income to a custodial parent. In a published opinion by Judge Greene, a unanimous panel affirmed. In re Marriage of Paul, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1023, 93 P.3d 734 (2004). We granted appellant’s petition for review.

While the Guidelines do not expressly provide for the imputation of reasonable child care costs, such imputation may be considered where circumstances warrant. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of PaulCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  2. In re the Marriage of BranchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. Sparks ex rel. Williams v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. Matter of Marriage of Moler and MolerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API