Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Gilmore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 1993No. 3-92-0720PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

The plaintiffs, William Faulkner, Janice Faulkner, and Kankakee Mechanical Systems, Inc., brought a four-count, third-amended complaint against defendants William Gilmore and Deuschle-Gilmore Insurance Agency, Inc., alleging that the defendants breached a fiduciary duty and a contract to terminate a surety agreement. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Counts I and II of the plaintiffs’ third-amended complaint alleged that the defendants breached a fiduciary duty in failing to provide insurance-related services.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Founders InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pittway Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Beckman v. Freeman United Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. DrewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Plumb v. Fluid Pump Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Zielinski v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Bivin v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. McClure v. SennstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API