Legal Opinion

Philp v. Hobart

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1951No. Civ. 18001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to quiet title to real property defendant Charles E. Hobart, as executor of the estate of George Philp, deceased, appeals.

The parcel which is the subject of this action was held at one time in joint tenancy by plaintiff and decedent, who were husband and wife. On May 5, 1930, plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from George Philp at which time she deeded the lot to him as his separate property.

Prior to July, 1940, the property was foreclosed upon for a delinquent street assessment bond and sold to the Board of Fire Pension…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Comstock v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Bell v. TownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Malone v. CliseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Faucher v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld v. PritzkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Wareham v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API