Legal Opinion

Bell v. Towns

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1949No. Civ. 16722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Action to quiet title to Lots 384 and 385 of the Forthmann Tract in the city of Los Angeles, formerly in the city of Watts. Judgment was entered for plaintiff from which defendant Catherine A. McKenna appeals.

Plaintiff’s title rests on tax deeds issued to the State of California after nonpayment of taxes of 1928 on Lot 384 and taxes of 1924 on Lot 385; deeds issued by the State of California in February, 1943, to Record Searching Title Company for both lots and a conveyance by that company to plaintiff.

Defendant has no record or documentary title to Lot 384. She claims title solely through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chesney v. GreshamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Philbrick v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Sheeter v. LifurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. McKenna v. PingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Bell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API