Legal Opinion

State v. Pavone

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1991No. 903SC1359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant brings forward eight assignments of error for our review. She does not address her first, fourth and sixth assignments in her brief, and they are therefore deemed abandoned. N.C.R. App. P., Rule 28. In her remaining assignments, defendant contends that the trial court erred in (1) relying on an improper and unconstitutional factor when imposing her sentence; (2) acting under a misapprehension of law when sentencing her; (3) failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of simple possession; (4), instructing the jury peremptorily on an element of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HazelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. GanttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API