Legal Opinion

State v. Hazel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1995No. 24185PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

Appellant contends the trial judge erred in failing to sentence him under the Youthful Offender Act (YOA), S.C. Code Ann. § 24-19-10 et. seq. (1989). We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

Appellant was arrested following a drug bust at a car wash. Appellant and two males were outside the building when the police pulled into the parking lot. Appellant walked quickly to the side of the building and was seen throwing something into a grassy area. A white vial was recovered and the contents tested positive as crack cocaine.

Appellant was convicted of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fermo v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. PavoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BonillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. BrouwerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. FollinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Mahdi v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API