Minn Billiard Co. v. Schwab

The substance of the argument of the plaintiff is to the effect that parties have a right to make their own contracts and to enforce the stipulations therein provided for a breach thereof; that in this case the promise *133to extend the payment of the note due April 1st was made without consideration and was therefore void, and could not be relied upon by the defendants, citing Fanning v. Murphy, 126 Wis. 538, 105 N. W. 1056; Radford v. Smith, 149 Wis. 163, 135 N. W. 472; and Haase v. Blank, 177 Wis. 17, 187 N. W. 669. It is true that a promise without a new consideration for the extension of the…