Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweilee, J.

Plaintiff expressly asserts on this appeal that his claim to recover all or some part of the $24,400 paid *60by the South Dakota company on account of the contract of January, 1920, is not founded upon rights or obligations arising out of the terms of the contract itself, but rather independently thereof; and because the defendant has received and retained a substantial sum of money, giving nothing in return, he is unjustly enriched at the expense of and to the damage of the other party to said contract.

No attack whatsoever is made by the plaintiff upon the validity or legality of the contract…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Klebe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Foeller v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Smith v. StowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Thurston v. Cedric Sanders CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ryken v. BlumerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Simms v. BoveeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API