Alabama Transit Co. v. The Tug Percheron
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENBERRY, Chief Judge.
The above entitled cause having come on for hearing on the pleadings and proof of the respective parties, and having been argued by respective counsel, the Court being fully informed in the premises, after due deliberation makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact
I
At all times material hereto, Alabama Transit Company was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of *320the State of Alabama, with its principal place of business in Birmingham, Alabama, and was the bareboat charterer and owner pro hac vice of the tug Richard Z.
II
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Great RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. the Socony No. 16Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Harris v. Sabine Transp. Co., Inc. The Augustus B. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Silver Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Tug Percheron, Her Engines, Furniture, Apparel, Etc., and Cornelius Kroll & Company v. Alabama Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958