Senko v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Plaintiff-appellant Jennifer Senko (“Senko”) appeals the district court’s ruling affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that Senko was not entitled to Social Security disability benefits. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our decision.
We review de novo the district court’s decision affirming the ALJ’s decision and will uphold a denial of benefits if the ALJ “applied the correct legal standards and substantial evidence supports the decision.” See Stout v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sherry Howard, on Behalf of Sarah Wolff v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Leonard TYLITZKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (SS) Fideldy v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Duarte v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020