Legal Opinion
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 1, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00065Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alexis Tembra Neal, No. CV-19-0065-TUC-LCK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Andrew Saul, 13 Defendant. 14 Plaintiff Alexis Neal filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial 15 review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), 16 Andrew Saul. (Doc. 1.) Before the Court are Neal’s Opening Brief, Defendant’s 17 Responsive Brief, and Neal’s Reply. (Docs. 23, 26, 27.) The parties have consented to 18 Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (Doc. 13.) Based on the pleadings…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.