Legal Opinion
McCollum v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 26, 2010No. 94-136VPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Petitioners Timothy McCollum and Lee Ann McCollum, on behalf of their child, Grant F. McCollum,2 seek review of an order by Special Master Laura D. Millman denying petitioners’ motions to reopen and modify the award petitioners received in March of 2000 under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. See McCollum v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 94-136, 2009 WL 2524190 (Fed.Cl.Spec.Mstr. July 27, 2009) (the “Order”). For the reasons stated below, petitioners’ motion for review is DENIED, and the special master’s Order is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- The Ad Hoc Committee of Az-Nm-Tx-Fl Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. The United States, Cemex S.A., and Apasco, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Fiskars, Inc. And Fiskars Oy Ab v. Hunt Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Almeida- Leon v. WM Capital Management IncDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
- Kenzora v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Kollasch v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Novarro v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016