Legal Opinion

Southeast Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 20, 1983No. 281-80TPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

Defendant has cross-moved for computation of the amount of judgment to be entered for plaintiffs Southeast Bank of Orlando, et al. (“plaintiffs”), successor trustees to Sun First National Bank of Orlando. In opposing defendant’s computation, plaintiffs urge that the amount of judgment should not be reduced as defendant requests.

FACTS

In 1979 the Court of Claims issued its decision in Sun First National Bank v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 469, 607 F.2d 1347 (1979), holding that the amount of gain on the sale of stock paid to a trust following the death of an income…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Southeast Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Dynamics Corporation of America (Formerly Claude Neon, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API