Legal Opinion

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., and General Mills Fun Group, Inc., Corporations, and Smeets en Schipper Spellen, B. v. a Corporation, as Co-Conspirator

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1982No. 79-4301Published

1Opinion of the Court

684 F.2d 1326

1982-2 Trade Cases 64,916

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GENERAL MILLS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GENERAL MILLS, INC., and General Mills Fun Group, Inc.,

Corporations, and Smeets En Schipper Spellen, B.

V., a Corporation, as Co-Conspirator,

Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 78-2780, 79-4301.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 10, 1981.

Submitted Nov. 9, 1981.

Decided Aug. 26, 1982.

Carl E. Person, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant; John Henry Denton, Denton, Jones & Chanin, Oakland, Cal., on brief.

R…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1981
  3. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API