Legal Opinion
Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1982No. Nos. 78-2780, 79-4301PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, we reverse and remand summary judgments granted to defendants in antitrust cases brought under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, charging violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2.
In our No. 78-2780, the trial court entered a summary judgment for the defendants in an action, No. C-74-2344 SW, in which Anti-Monopoly, Inc. charged the defendants with monopolization of the business of making and distributing certain games, specifically, the game of “Monopoly.” With this action, the trial court consolidated Counts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc., and Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc., and Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1981