Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1985No. 2367PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and robbery. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury regarding the victim’s identification testimony, and in failing to instruct the jury that if they found a Commonwealth witness to have been an accomplice, they had to view his testimony with caution. We affirm.

The Commonwealth witness who, according to appellant, could have been found to have been an accomplice, was named Eugene Taylor. Up to a point, appellant’s testimony and Taylor’s testimony…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SisakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Reid, A., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API