Charles MacDonald Et Ux and State of Louisiana, Etc. v. Monsanto Co., Dow Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises the question of whether the labeling requirements of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y (1980 & Supp.1993), preempt parallel state law labeling requirements. Because we find that FI-FRA does indeed preempt state laws that are “different from or in addition” to FIFRA requirements, we reverse the district court’s denial of summary judgment, and render judgment on this issue in favor of the defendants.
I
Plaintiff-appellee Charles MacDonald, a chemical sprayer for the Louisiana Department of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.