Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Drienik v. Clifford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1997No. 72132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. He alleges Judge Crancer erroneously failed to transfer a case pending against him to the proper venue. In addition, he alleges Judge Clifford erroneously denied his petition for mandamus filed in St. Louis County. In that petition, relator sought relief identical to that sought from this court. Respondents have filed their suggestions in opposition to the issuance of the writ.

The facts and law are clear concerning the venue issue. In the interest of justice, as permitted by Rule 84.24, we dispense with a preliminary order, answer, further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Quest Communications Corp. v. BaldridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. McClain v. HeckemeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Bowman v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mertens v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Johnston v. LuckenbillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Platinum Express, Inc. v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Elwood (In re Elwood)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Turnbow v. SchroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API