Legal Opinion
David Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2004No. 02-35881PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge ALARCÓN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.
ORDER
The court’s opinion, filed June 10, 2004, [371 F.3d 645] is amended as follows:
The second paragraph on slip op. 7621 [371 F.3d at 647] that reads:
We affirm the denial of his motion because we conclude that Yellow Cab presented sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether it terminated Mr. Enlow’s employment temporarily without discriminatory intent. We reverse the order granting Yellow Cab’s motion for summary judgment, however, because the district erred in concluding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kathryn Sheppard v. David Evans and Assoc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- John France v. Jeh JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Joan Opara v. Janet YellenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Kathy Bliesner v. The Communication Workers of America Verizon Northwest Inc., Fka Gte Northwest IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.