State v. Cook
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from.Buchanan Criminal Court. — Hon. Benj. J. Casteel, Judge. (1) A panel of forty jurors from which the defendants. were required to make their challenges- was impaneled by the court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from.Buchanan Criminal Court. — Hon. Benj. J. Casteel, Judge. (1) A panel of forty jurors from which the defendants. were required to make their challenges- was impaneled by the court. The defendants filed a motion to .quash the panel alleging that they were entitled to a panel of forty-seven as the city of St.' Joseph, in which the court was held, was a city of over 100,000. They based their right to the panel of forty-seven jurors upon sections 2621 and 2622, Revised Statutes 1899,.which motion was overruled and excepted to by the defendants. They also excepted to the action of the…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
At the June Term, 1900, of the criminal court of Buchanan county, the grand jury returned .the following indictment:
“State of Missouri, County of Buchanan, ss.
“In the Criminal Court of Buchanan county, at the June term thereof, 1900.
“The grand jurors of the State of Missouri, within and for the body of the county of Buchanan aforesaid, being duly impaneled and sworn, upon their oath do present that Jesse Cook and Boy Progge, on the sixth day of May, 1900, at the county of Buchanan and State aforesaid, in and upon one James Mize then and there being, feloniously, willfully, premeditatedly,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Ex parte SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- State v. FurgersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- State v. MaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RennisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Ex Parte KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. ClineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.