Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Turlington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 616PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

In considering the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand plaintiff’s motions for judgments of nonsuit as to defendants’ counterclaims, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendants. Evidence favorable to plaintiff must be disregarded. Gillikin v. Mason, 256 N.C. 533, 124 S.E. 2d 541; Robinette v. Wike, 265 N.C. 551, 144 S.E. 2d 594.

Mrs. Turlington’s testimony tends to show: She had been following the three vehicles for several miles. When she undertook to pass, she had reached a place where she had a clear view of the left lane for approximately half a mile.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinette v. WikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Gillikin v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Locklear v. SnowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API