Connolly v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
MEYERS, J.,
delivered a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, HOLLAND, and JOHNSON, JJ., joined.
Today a majority of this Court expands the language of Article 42.12 § 5(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure beyond its plain meaning. In addition, the majority overrules *742precedent regarding the State’s burden to show due diligence in attempting to apprehend a defendant after the capias issues and prior to the arrest, and reallocates that burden to the defendant. I dissent.
I
A brief review of the salient facts:
Prior to the February 19, 1997 hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate guilt,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Phynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Olowosuko v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.