Legal Opinion

State v. Shytle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1989No. 542A87PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The appellant, by her first assignment of error, challenges the holding of the court that she was competent to stand trial. N.C.G.S. § 15A-1001(a) provides:

No person may be tried, convicted, sentenced, or punished for a crime when by reason of mental illness or defect he is unable to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to comprehend his own situation in ref erence to the proceedings, or to assist in his defense in a rational or reasonable manner. This condition is hereinafter referred to as “incapacity to proceed.”

The statute provides three separate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. McHoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. ColeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. ChukwuCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API