Legal Opinion

Cem Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 65650Published

Return filed by petitioner which included the results of operations of its predecessor within the year without showing separately petitioner's income, deductions, and credits, does not comply with the statutory requirements regarding returns and is insufficient to put the statute of limitations in motion.

1Opinion of the Court

THE CEM SECURITIES CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Cem Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 65650.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

28 B.T.A. 102; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1182;

May 16, 1933, Promulgated

Return filed by petitioner which included the results of operations of its predecessor within the year without showing separately petitioner's income, deductions, and credits, does not comply with the statutory requirements regarding returns and is insufficient to put the statute of limitations in motion.

J. Marvin Haynes, Esq., for the petitioner.

F. L. Van…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cem Sec. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API