Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hayward
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 18, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5619PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This proceeding relates to a petition by the party Smith, appellant. In effect, the petition involves a bill of review in equity 1 of a final judgment previously rendered by this court on an appeal taken from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding, the petitioner alleging here that the party Hayward, appellee, perpetrated a fraud upon the court in that case: Smith v. Hayward, 176 F.2d 914, 37 C.C.P.A., Patents, 718.
The opinion in the case sets forth in detail the issue and basis for our conclusion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Frost v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Josserand v. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Learned v. ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LeBar v. HaynieWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Alonzo L. Smith v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, John T. HaywardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Krenzer v. StoffelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977