Legal Opinion

Frost v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1918No. 8753PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Stephens County; Joe Burkett, Judge. Suit by O. S. Martin and wife against Fred W. Frost to cancel an oil and gas lease. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Suit was instituted November 23, 1916, by appellees against appellant to cancel an oil and gas lease. Plaintiffs pleaded forfeiture and abandonment. Defendant denied that any facts existed sufficient to establish either. Upon a jury trial under a general charge, a verdict and judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, from which defendant has appealed.

The lease contract between O. S. Martin and wife and Frost was dated January 20, 1915, and the portions thereof material to a determination of the questions presented on this appeal are hereafter set out, to wit:

"That the lessors, in consideration of…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Company v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Barrett v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Cox v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Dorchester Gas Producing Co. v. Harlow Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API