Legal Opinion

Railway Co. v. Beeler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM GRAINGER. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Grainger County. W. R. Hicics, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBurton, J.

Action against the K. 0., G. & L, R. R. Co. to recover damages for a trespass by entering upon the premises of Beeler, and constructing its line of railway across Ms farm without having purchased or condemned the right of way. The Court considered that the plaintiff, if entitled to any thing, was damaged in the sum of $1,500. *550There was a verdict and judgment for this sum, from which the railway company has appealed.

The company’s defense was that the plaintiff, in consideration of public and private benefits, had, before its entry upon his premises, conveyed to it, by deed duly executed and…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weatherly v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  2. Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. KokoskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Hood v. GroomsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Brown Ex Rel. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. Pyramid Operating Authority, Inc. v. City of Memphis (In Re Pyramid Operating Authority, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API