Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott Lee Young, United States of America v. Donald Charles Allman, United States of America v. Michael Allen Crow
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1993No. 91-8554, 91-8555 and 91-8556PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
Scott Lee Young, and Donald Charles Allman pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess methamphetamine and amphetamine with intent to distribute. Allman also pleaded guilty to possessing amphetamine with intent to distribute. Michael Allen Crow pleaded guilty only to possessing amphetamine with intent to distribute. Their presentence reports (PSR) recommended that they be accountable for the distribution of several kilograms of methamphetamine — Young, 7.8; Crow and Allman, 3.41 and 3.46 respectively. Subsequent to a sentencing hearing, the district court concluded that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Michael CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Carmine Fatico, and Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Robert LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-BaezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. VitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Rangi KnightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.