Legal Opinion
Scarso v. Briks
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1996No. 95 Civ. 0575 (BDP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bronwyn Scarso (“Scarso”) brought this action against defendant Harold J. Briks and Harold J. Briks D.C.P.C. and Briks Chiropractic Center under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Scarso seeks to recover benefits under a retirement plan. Additionally, she seeks penalties and attorneys fees. For reasons set out below, the Court finds that Scarso is entitled to recover the benefits due under the retirement plan as well as penalties and attorneys fees.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Defendant Harold Briks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Man Yoon v. Fordham University Faculty And Administrative Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lavigna v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Ginsberg v. Valhalla Anesthesia Associates, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.