Legal Opinion

Pink v. Meyer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1936No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLatter., J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $10,950. It is the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant received moneys equal to that sum from the Concord Casualty and Surety Company, now in liquidation, in the form of improperly issued corporate checks and without furnishing any consideration therefor. The defendant contends that the checks received by him were in repayment of a loan made by him to Harold R Cronin, president of the Concord Casualty and Surety Company, and that he had neither actual nor constructive notice that the checks accepted by him were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Martindale v. DeKayNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Martindale v. De KayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Martindale v. De KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Gaylord v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pink v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API